The News and Record reports today that some kind of consensus among the Melderec crowd is developing that the performing arts center needs to be located downtown in spite of the additional cost:
“I am not looking at this as something we are going to fail on,” the mayor said. “We are going to make it work.”
Asked if Brown’s coliseum concept might be an alternative, Perkins said, “I think it is going to be downtown. ... This city doesn’t need a backup plan.”
Here are some thoughts regarding how the city should proceed:
1. Matt Brown should not be permitted to make any presentations; nor should be be permitted to advocate for the center. The city council's decision to place him in the driver's seat was a huge mistake. The council does not have any basis for deciding that is the best way to approach this issue. Facts should be obtained and decisions made first before any consideration of involving Brown in the process.
2. A number of parties have referred to the performing arts center in Durham-- DPAC. It should be noted that DPAC is operated by a private organization; and it generates a profit. The city of Durham built the facility, and shares in the profits. If you have Matt Brown and the Coliseum management run the facility, chances are good that it will be a big money loser for the city. If the facility in Durham can turn a profit, we should have every expectation that any facility located in Greensboro will do so also.
3. Facts and details should be obtained from Durham before proceeding. The Greensboro Coliseum has an influential but entrenched group of supporters who represent vested interests. These supporters should not be permitted to have undue influence over the process.
4. My own opinion is that we should not have another bond referendum on this matter. The voters have already rejected it twice; and we do not need more debt.
5. But if the bond referendum proceeds, the language on the ballot should be very specific regarding where the facility is to be located, and how it is going to be run. City staff has already been quoted in a news article suggesting it is permissible to place non-specific language on the ballot. But this is an invitation to mislead the public and play games behind the scenes-- similar to what occurred with the aquatic center. The ballot language needs to be an accurate, specific reflection of what is being planned. That means all the research and information-gathering and planning needs to be performed before the bond referendum is placed on the ballot.
Recent Comments